In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > I really would rather not duplicate all of this, which looks extremely > > similar to regular NAND. Is there reason why we don't use the mtd_info > > function pointer interface? > > Agreed, It's almost same as NAND code. > Now nand code uses two modes, legacy and mtd. Because I don't want to > break the NAND code , I used the duplicated code. > Basically it should be used the common mtd style code except legacy. > > So first it added the current code, next time it tries to use the > common interface and some code clean up.
I understand that you will submit a cleaned up patch later? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
