On 01:57 Sat 26 Jul , Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:28 PM, kenneth johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was afraid that what was needed was more or less a complete linker but > > it looks like if one generate the dynamic reloc table a much simpler > > linker(relocation function) is needed. Still probably a lot more complex > > than the GOT and fixup code that is just a loop over a table. We may > > need a case also ;-) > > The GOT relocation works. It works really well. As long as gcc and > ld put the correct GOT bits into the GOT table. It seems not all > versions of gcc do it in the same way with the same flags.
Why not set the code depending on the GCC version? Best Regards, J. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
