Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In order to not introduce new warnings on the aforementioned three > > architectures as well as i386, I added a cast to unsigned long. This > > should be safe even if bi_baudrate is declared as 'int' (assuming > > there's no such thing as negative baud rates.) > > Instead of the cast, should we not rather fix ARM, BF and MIPS to use > ulong like anybody else?
Yeah, that's probably better. But I don't know what sort of side effects that kind of change might cause. There could be code somewhere that needs bi_baudrate to be signed for some obscure reason. But if you're ok with it and people are willing to test, I can certainly make that change. Haavard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
