On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c64xx.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ > > +/* > > + * (C) Copyright 2006 DENX Software Engineering > > Please add your name here.
I will add my copyright in a couple of files, but I would rather not add it to Makefiles. Below I quote an earlier post on this list (funnily, I wasn't able to get it in sourceforge's archive...), which addresses Copyrights in Makefiles. To me it sounds reasonable, because in my example I really added very little "IP" to it, almost exclusively copy-paste from other Makefiles. What I learned, is one may never delete copyrights from files, ones they are there, that's why I preserved yours - that's how this file was in Samsung's version. But I don't think my Copyright there will serve any good purpose. > > +/* > > + * Function to print out oob buffer for debugging > > + * Written by jsgood > > Then jsgood should be mentioned in the (C) lines? Is it allowed to add other peaople's copyright without their consent? I am working on the rest comments... cleaning up others' mess. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ################################### ########### QUOTED MAIL ########### ################################### >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 9 14:11:51 2008 Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:09:10 -0400 From: Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jens Gehrlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/10 v2] [ARM] TQMA31: add new board with i.MX31 processor Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Jens Gehrlein wrote: > > > diff --git a/board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile b/board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..f7e17c8 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile > > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ > > +# > > +# Copyright (C) 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > +# Copyright (C) 2008, Jens Gehrlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Thanks for the credit, but, although IANAL, I think, one does not _have_ to > preserve the copyright of the original file when it gets copied to a new one. > Otherwise most open-source files would have a veeeery long list of > Copyrights:-) Am I right? > > Thanks > Guennadi IANAL, but I play one on Groklaw sometimes, much to PJ's chagrin. ;-) This is a squishy area. It is dependent on what of the original work survives the modification and whether the surviving pieces are copyrightable. It also depends on what country you are contemplating suing in. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limitations_and_exceptions_to_copyright> Things that must be done in certain ways are not copyrightable, so Makefiles are pretty marginal to start with IMHO. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_of_originality> My opinion is to leave the original copyright notice in there and err on the side of preserving reasonable copyright notices. The lawyers will be happy to tell us that we did it wrong if it ever came to a lawsuit, and I would prefer that they tell us that we had a useless copyright notice in the file rather than tell us that we should have had a notice but didn't... Best regards, gvb ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
