In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> 
> I've been using as follows:
> 
> setenv autostart no
> bootm
> <fdt fixups>
> bootepapr 0 $bootm_fdtaddr

Now I see where your intentions with the autostart are coming from.

Sorry, this is not the way it is supposed to work, and not the way it
is documented.

> Additionally these seems like the low level functionality needed if we  
> want to move to the "scriptable" bootm were we decouple image loading  
> from the actual boot mechanism.

In terms of splitting bootm into smaller units you are riught. In
terms of implementation it's wrong.

I think I will back out the autostart patch because it introduces
incorrect and undocumented behaviour.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Commitment, n.:      Commitment can be illustrated by a breakfast
of ham and eggs. The chicken was involved, the pig was committed.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to