In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> 
> > Oops? This is expected and normal behaviour. Did anybody complain
> > about this?
> 
> Real, any reason why?  I understand on classic PPC this might be the  
> case but I see no reason for it to be so on book-e parts.

Well, one reason might be to have identical code for all PPC systems ?

> > High memory means leave them in flash?
> 
> No I leave them at the relocated location in DDR.

Ah, I see.

> > All references to flash memory must be relocated to RAM, including the
> > exception vectors, of course.
> 
> Any they are.  I'm just removing a second relocation that is a hold  
> over from how 6xx PPC exception vectors work.

Not only 6xx. Actually all PPC.

> > I don't think so. Seems to introduce a bug.
> 
> I disagree with that.  It resolved a bug when I did.  'setenv  
> autostart no; bootm'

That might be a problem only when using your broken autostart patches.

We will fix this by backing out that patch ;-)

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to