On Thursday 05 June 2008 09:24:04 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > To be honest, as far as I can see, all other architectures get by > > > without such "macros" without loosing anything and the arguments you > > > gave this far did not convince me that they are needed. > > > > other arches do not have a central control of the architecture and allow > > any random group out there to create their own. these headers provide > > API compatibility across all Blackfin compilers and projects. > > I hope I'm misinterpreting you - but to me that sounds as if you > consider peer review that eliminates bogus code and tries to come up > with better solutions a bad thing? Because you have to give up > "central control", i. e. the ability to write the code exactly as you > think it should be done? > > Please tell me that you do NOT think that this code is so good so > that no peer review on it is allowed because it would only ruin the > superior quality of it...
when i said "control" i was referring to the architecture itself, not the source code around it. the Blackfin architecture has a single licensee: the people who own it. it isnt like arm/ppc/mips/etc... which licenses out the core for other people to make derivatives and their own weird extensions. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
