Peter, On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Wolfgang, > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> > If CONFIG_I2C_CMD_TREE is defined, individual i2c commands such as >> > 'imd', 'imm', 'imw', etc should not be available as their functionality >> > is duplicated in the 'i2c' command. >> >> If I remember correctly, there has been discussion to keep both >> variants in parallel for some transition time. >> >> I have added a link to your patch to the Feature Removal page at >> http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/TaskFeatureRemovalSchedule >> so we will not forget this as soon as e have a formal Feature Removal >> file in place. >> >> Is this OK with you? > > According to the top-level README file since at least U-Boot v1.1.5: > "CONFIG_I2C_CMD_TREE is a recommended option that places > all I2C commands under a single 'i2c' root command. The > older 'imm', 'imd', 'iprobe' etc. commands are considered > deprecated and may disappear in the future." > > I personally think that the 2 year warning the README gave is sufficient > but don't have a strong preference if this feature is removed now or at > a later date. Either way, I think the task feature removal schedule in > general is a great idea. > As the author of this stuff, I apologize for the ambiguous wording. At the time, I lobbied to have the old-style commands removed and IIRC we settled on leaving them for a couple of releases. You have my full ACK to purge it at any time.
> Best, > Peter > regards, Ben _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
