Hi Guennadi,

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Last time Scott Wood suggested to use nand_spl you replied "I think using
> nand_spl is the best approach, but it will needs more effort to complete."
> and "Anyway, right now we can have iMX31PDK booting with this code as an
> option for users willing to use U-Boot in this board." So, what's the
> status of this effort? If this your new submission, which still doesn't
> use nand_spl is not really targeted for upstream merge, I think, it would
> be better not to mark these mails "PATCH". Or have I missed anything?
>

This patch is just a rebase of previous patch, to be merged on
u-boot-arm/master repository.
I don't have nand_spl working until now.

I am new sending patches to u-boot mailing list. So what is the
problem when calling it of "PATCH"? Please, let me know about my
mistake, can you explain about it?

> Thanks
> Guennadi
>

Best Regards,

Alan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to