On 00:23 Sun 26 Oct , Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > The information displayed when CONFIG_LCD_INFO is set is inherently > > board-specific, so it should be done by the board code. The current code > > dealing with this only handles two cases, and is already a horrible mess > > of #ifdeffery. > > > > Yes, this duplicates some code, but it also allows boards to print more > > board-specific information; this used to be very difficult. > > > > Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > board/atmel/at91cap9adk/at91cap9adk.c | 29 ++++++++++ > > board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c | 29 ++++++++++ > > board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/at91sam9263ek.c | 29 ++++++++++ > > board/atmel/at91sam9rlek/at91sam9rlek.c | 29 ++++++++++ > > board/lwmon/lwmon.c | 29 ++++++++++ > > board/tqc/tqm8xx/tqm8xx.c | 26 +++++++++ > > common/lcd.c | 84 > > ++--------------------------- > > include/lcd.h | 2 + > > 8 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) > > Jean-Christophe, you ACKed this patch in > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-October/042389.html. > > Should it go through u-boot-video repository or do you intend to > pick it up? > > Note that it needs some fixes: > s/CFG_MAX_NAND_DEVICE/CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE
Apply it I'll pull your tree when you've done Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
