Dear Jens Scharsig,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > I testedm the patch, but it doesn't fix the problem on the
> > AT91RM9200DK board (that's the one I could easily test at the
> > moment).
>
> I think my patch only don't work on AT91RM9200DK, AT91RM9200EK or
> AT91RM9200DF board. Blame it on this solution is the #ifdef construct in
> /cpu/arm920t/start.s at line 264. There are no low_level_init run for
> DK, EK andDF board.
I agree. That code looks pretty bogus to me, too.
I can confirm that removing the "defined(CONFIG_AT91RM9200DK) ||" part
there makes the code work on the AT91RM9200DK board (j24: patch
following ASAP).
Any AT91RM9200EK and AT91RM9200DF users out there to test this?
> It's only effect on Atmel Boards. I can't test is it truth.
> So the question goes to DK users and arm custodian.
For DK, the situation looks clear now.
Thanks for the patch!
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ja, mach' nur einen Plan, sei nur ein grosses Licht
und mach' dann noch 'nen zweiten Plan, geh'n tun sie beide nicht."
-- Bert Brecht, Dreigroschenoper
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
