ons 2009-01-07 klockan 02:11 +0100 skrev Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
> Ulf & Pink Boy
> 
> please take a look on
> 
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-at91.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/mm
> 
> Best Regards,

I had a look at the patches in u-boot-at91.git
and it seems like it was based on 
something I provided a long time ago.

As an example: 
The at91rm9200ek.c contains:


     writel(AT91C_PA23_TXD2, ((AT91PS_PIO) AT91C_BASE_PIOA)->PIO_OER);


The new patchset I provide do the same but it is implemented like:


     at91_set_gpio_output(AT91_PIN_PA23, 1);


which is much more similar to the at91sam9 way of doing things.
I think it would be more consistent to use the sam9 way
of doing things.



> J.
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to