On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Henrik Nordstr??m, > > In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > > s??n 2012-11-25 klockan 21:01 +0100 skrev Wolfgang Denk: > > > > > I think you should avoid doing that. It's ugly, and I see no real > > > advantages for it. > > > > Avoid using the same board config file for multiple boards even when > > they differ only in one config parameter or in the SoC model mounted on > > the board? > > No. Avoid introducing yet another CONFIG_SYS_*_NAME.
I think part of the solution is that in the environment now we have board_name for the unique run-time-determined board we are on (which defaults to CONFIG_SYS_BOARD). In each of these Allwiner SoCs do we have the ability to tell at run-time what we are on, or only build-time? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
