Dear Stephen Warren, In message <50c918a5.6090...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote: > > > This seems reasonable in the interim while we are hard-coding things > > but needing more flexibility. How do you plan to configure the actual > > address - is it with the ODM data or FDT? > > I intend to use the ODMDATA. This already includes a field that > specifies which UART to use. I'm working on some patches (to > BCT-generation tools and U-Boot) that define an ODMDATA2 value, which > will indicate the complete pinmux configuration required for the UART, > so everything can be self-contained. I'm fairly close to publishing > these patches.
Arghh... Do we really, really have to invent yet another way to pass hardware configuration information? Especially one totally incompatible to any other system? I think I will be objecting against such an approach. Please use the device tree instead. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Virtue is a relative term. -- Spock, "Friday's Child", stardate 3499.1 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot