On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:05:26PM -0800, York Sun wrote: > On 01/23/2013 02:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > On 01/23/2013 04:01:49 PM, York Sun wrote: > >> On 01/23/2013 01:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > >> > On 01/23/2013 03:46:04 PM, York Sun wrote: > >> >> On 01/23/2013 01:41 PM, York Sun wrote: > >> >> I should put RFC in the subject as I am not able to compile all ARCH > >> >> myself. > >> > > >> > So how do you see this patch becoming non-RFC? I think most people > >> > don't have every single toolchain. You should at least get a toolchain > >> > for a couple major architectures such as ARM. Usually RFC is for when > >> > you know the patch has issues, and don't want it applied yet even if > >> > nobody else finds fault with it. > >> > > >> > >> I know this version has problem. I am hoping more people get involved > >> and test what they can. I tried the arm toolchain you pointed to me. I > >> couldn't run MAKEALL for arm. > > > > Even before your patch, using USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC? How many boards failed? > > > I don't know. Wolfgang brought it. Allen kindly offered help to verify > on tegra which uses USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC.
I actually have a script to build all 1000+ boards in every architecture, but I think a few of my toolchains are broken (openrisc and blackfin come to mind). I've been thinking about incorporating that functionality into MAKEALL as a set of patches. In the meantime I can build and test on tegra, which as York says uses USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC. -Allen -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot