Thierry/Lucas, On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:56:33AM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: >> Lucas, >> >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Lucas Stach <d...@lynxeye.de> wrote: >> > Hi Tom, >> > >> > Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 10:17 -0700 schrieb Tom Warren: >> >> Linux dts files were used for those boards that didn't already >> >> have sdhci info populated. Tamonten has their own dtsi file with >> >> common sdhci nodes (sourced from Linux). >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twar...@nvidia.com> >> >> --- >> >> v2: >> >> - cleanup comments in dts files/match w/kernel files >> >> - add sdhci aliases in all dts files >> >> - use tegra20-tamonten.dtsi from the kernel for AD boards >> >> >> >> arch/arm/dts/tegra20-tamonten.dtsi | 489 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > >> > I'm not sure if pushing the whole file in this patch is the right thing >> > to do. >> >> I didn't want to edit it since we seem to be moving towards using the >> Linux DTS files in toto in U-Boot (as per Stephen & Simon). Does it do >> any harm to have the whole thing here? Saves some work later. Thierry >> - what do you think? > > Given that it isn't used anywhere I don't think we really need it right > now. We can always add it later when we can make better use of it.
It actually is used (for SDMMC/sdhci) now, Thierry. That's why it's in this patchset. I had originally put the sdhci node for Avionic Design boards in their respective .dts files, but Stephen pointed out that the kernel had a tegra20-tamonten.dtsi file with common info, which included the sdhci node, and asked that I use it, instead, so we echo the kernel layout. So I pulled that file into my MMC DT patchset, and used it in all AD board builds (medcom/tec/plutux) - it's pulled in via an override of CONFIG_ARCH_DEVICE_TREE in the config files. So the options seem to be: a) Don't use the tamonton dtsi file, and put the sdhci nodes in the AD dts files, just like all other boards (this was my V1 approach). Vetoed by Stephen. b) Use tegra20-tamonten.dtsi as is, identical to the kernel file. If necessary, I can move it's inclusion to a separate patch, independent of the MMC DT patchset, as suggested by Lucas. c) Use tegra20-tamonten.dtsi, but just with the sdhci node (is this what you're suggesting, Thierry?). I'd still pull it in via a CONFIG_ARCH_DEVICE_TREE #define in the AD config files. Let me know ASAP - I'd like to get V3 upstreamed soon so I can move on to work on the T30/T114 MMC patches. Tom > > Thierry _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
