Hi Stephen, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 02/12/2013 12:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Tom Warren <twarren.nvi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: > ... >>> That's the current POR for Tegra DT use in upstream U-Boot, assuming I >>> can find an up-to-date kernel with the latest DTS files (I'll use >>> Stephen's swarren/linux-tegra.git/for-next until told otherwise). >> >> Yes that was always my problem - finding what the kernel actually >> used, might use, etc. > > I must say I find this quite puzzling; the kernel repos aren't exactly > hidden.
Well if a change has made it to a repo then things are easier, particularly if it is next/. It was chasing down patches on mailing lists that I found hard. > > Tegra's kernel for-next is likely the best place right now as any DT > changes typically go through that tree. However, on the off-chance any > other maintainer picks up any changes, linux-next.git would have the > latest bindings. That's all been true for a year or more. > > That said, there is a move to either move the binding definitions and > .dts files out of the kernel tree and/or stop taking changes to them > through individual SoC trees, but perhaps through the device tree repo. > If that does happen, I'll let you know. Sounds good. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot