Hi Benoît, On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:42:16 +0100 (CET), Benoît Thébaudeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thus, if you don't mind, I'd prefer patch 31/31 to move out of the > > series. And, since I want to avoid anyone the hassle of going through > > this again, I guess I will have to submit a patch for relocate_code() > > factorization -- quite probably above your series, since many fixes > > you make in it may be useful or even needed. > > OK, let's do this. It will also help to stop postponing the application of > this > series because of more new versions. Also, yes. One minor request re your upcoming v9: beside posting the series as you do on the mailing list, can you provide a git repo and a branch which could be pulled, even if it contains patman annotations? This way, the review process continues unchanged on the list, and I can begin the relocate_code() work without having to wait for your series to be applied or to apply every patch in your series manualy myself. > Please just Cc me when you will post these patches so that I review them. I will. > Best regards, > Benoît Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
