>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Porter <mpor...@ti.com> writes:
Hi, >> Did you figure out why it was working for you with 96 MHz ref? Matt> Unfortunately not at a root cause level. Unless I'm missing Matt> something I would have expected the calculations from the Matt> supplied 96 MHz ref clock to result in 2x the clock the SD card Matt> can handle due to the incorrect divider. However, with the LA Matt> attached, I found that a 2-3 MHz SDCLK was being generated after Matt> the capability probe occurs. Odd and incorrect, but Matt> functional. After switching to 192MHz I was able to sample a Matt> nominal 25MHz SDCLK as expected on a regular SD card advertising Matt> that as its capability. I don't like it but I'm going to mark Matt> this down as "something undocumented" as I only have PG1.0 Matt> silicon but can't find an errata sheet for that version right Matt> now. Ok, thanks for the info. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
