On 03/13/2013 08:13 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Warren [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 4:30 PM
>> To: Tom Warren
>> Cc: [email protected]; Stephen Warren; Tom Warren
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Tegra114: Fix/update GP padcfg register struct
>>
>> On 03/13/2013 04:34 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
>>> Differences in padcfg registers (some removed, some added) between
>>> Tegra30 and Tegra114 weren't picked up when I ported this file.
>>> Also removed the HSM setting for SDIOCFG - not called out in TRM.
>>
>> The actual diff would be a lot easier to see if the register offsets hadn't 
>> all
>> had 0x800 added to them as well in the same patch. MODEREG and HIDREV
>> are at the same absolute address in Tegra20/30/114 for example.
> I felt it prudent to add 0x800 since the register addresses spilled over into 
> the 0x900 range, and it would have looked weird to have 0xFC, then 0x900, 
> 0x904, etc.
> I could revert the old offset, and then make the change to the new regs go 
> 0xFC, then 0x100, 0x104, etc. i.e. offset based off of the absolute address 
> of the GP base of 0x70000800. Let me know.

I think it'd make sense to either list the offsets as relative to the
start of the struct (as they are now), or have 2 separate patches the
first adding 0x800 to everything as a simple/obvious patch, and the
second fixing the struct to match Tegra114 HW.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to