> -----Original Message----- > From: Phillips Kim-R1AAHA > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 4:08 AM > To: Gupta Ruchika-R66431 > Cc: Otavio Salvador; U-Boot Mailing List; Fleming Andy-AFLEMING > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] FSL SECURE BOOT: Add support for next > level image validation > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 04:43:23 +0000 > Gupta Ruchika-R66431 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > > On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador > > > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 8:23 PM > > > To: Gupta Ruchika-R66431 > > > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; Fleming Andy-AFLEMING > > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] FSL SECURE BOOT: Add support for > > > next level image validation > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Ruchika Gupta > > > <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > The patch set adds support for next level image validation (linux, > > > > rootfs, dtb) in secure boot scenarios. > > > > > > It seems to focus in PowerPC, do you know if same code could be > > > ported to ARM? > > For the code to be ported to ARM platform, corresponding hardware blocks > like cryptographic accelerator/SW support for crypto operations, IOMMU and a > security monitor block will be required. > > i.mx6 has, and other future ARM-based devices will have, a CAAM, so I see no > reason why any of this code should be restricted to power arch at all. > > How does this patchseries integrate with this SHA offload > patchseries: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/156321 > > and this "verified boot" implementation: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/156422 > > ? > > Kim
Thanks for the suggestion Kim. I will have a look at the links you mentioned and see how my patches can fit in. Since I am on leave this week so my response on this will be a little delayed. Ruchika _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
