> In message <200903261103.28452...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > > #define FLASH_FIXUP_ADDR_8(addr) ((void*)((ulong)(addr)^2)) > > > #define FLASH_FIXUP_ADDR_16(addr) ((void*)((ulong)(addr)^2)) > ... > > Yes, I think this could be accepted. The overall impact on > the driver is not > > too big. Let's see if others have some complaints about it. > If not, I'll > > accept you patch after you changed some minor details. > > I think that should be an inline function instead of a macro. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk
Thanks for the comments. I will take it into account before sending the complete patch series for the board(s). But I have to do some more cleanups before I can do that. I just wanted to check if this is the right way to go. Best regards, Thomas Langer _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot