Hi Albert, On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:13:16 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:04:44 -0700, Tom Warren > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Albert, > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Albert ARIBAUD > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:59:29 -0700, Tom Warren <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Albert, > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:38 AM > > > > > To: Stephen Warren > > > > > Cc: U-Boot; Prafulla Wadaskar; Tom Rini; Tom Warren > > > > > Subject: Re: [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches > > > > > > > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:49:45 -0600, Stephen Warren > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/11/2013 09:25 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Older toolchain and PPC incompatibilities appeared in the last two > > > > > > > additions to ToT ARM. To avoid non-bisectability, ToT has been > > > > > > > rolled back from abbecf4c87 to ae74b65987. This removes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > abbecf4 ARM: Fix __bss_start and __bss_end in linker scripts > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > Stephen, that is an occasion to add your proposal to aad17a2. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom Warren as the Tegra maintainer should be taking care of this. I > > > am > > > > > > simply pointing out that the currently proposed changes to the SPL > > > > > > size checking don't fulfil the requirements for Tegra. I don't > > > > > > expect > > > > > > to have to fix the patches. > > > > > > > > > > I did not mean for you to do it, only that there was an opportunity to > > > do it. :) > > > > > > > > Why should I be fixing something I didn't break, and that worked fine > > > before your change? > > > > > > Er... > > > > > > Was "I did not mean for you to do it" unclear? > > > > > Yes, it was unclear. > > Apologies, then. I only meant to say that we had time to discuss and > incorporate your solution in the SPL max size patch series since it had *Stephen's* solution. Sorry, yesterday was kind of hectic. > just had to be "unapplied". > > > Tom Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
