On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I think this patch could be split in two: > > I do not agree. > > >> * one for loadaddr fix (which is the real fix here) > > My patch does not do any fix. We are able to load a non-dt kernel currently. > > I am adding a new feature: allow booting a dt kernel.
So in this case could you make a new patch to sync the other changes in the env? So it is kept in sync and avoid divertion from other boards we did it already? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
