Dear Fabio Estevam, > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> > > Change MUX_CONFIG_EMI to use the same drive strength as the bootlets code > from Freescale, which results in much better stability. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> > --- > Changes since v2: > - Only change the drive strength > Changes since v1: > - Only adjust MUX_CONFIG_EMI > > board/freescale/mx23evk/spl_boot.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/board/freescale/mx23evk/spl_boot.c > b/board/freescale/mx23evk/spl_boot.c index b6f4e7e..fd6b3d9 100644 > --- a/board/freescale/mx23evk/spl_boot.c > +++ b/board/freescale/mx23evk/spl_boot.c > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > #include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h> > > #define MUX_CONFIG_SSP1 (MXS_PAD_3V3 | MXS_PAD_8MA | MXS_PAD_PULLUP) > -#define MUX_CONFIG_EMI (MXS_PAD_3V3 | MXS_PAD_16MA | MXS_PAD_PULLUP) > +#define MUX_CONFIG_EMI (MXS_PAD_3V3 | MXS_PAD_12MA | MXS_PAD_PULLUP)
btw. if 3V3 setting doesn't exist, why do we have it here? We should just can it then. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
