Hi, Andre
> +.globl _nonsec_init
> +_nonsec_init:
These two lines can be written:
ENTRY(_nonsec_init)
> + mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0 @ read MIDR
> + bfc r0, #20, #4 @ mask out variant
> + bfc r0, #0, #4 @ and revision
Why do you hard code bit positions
even though MIDR_PRIMARY_PART_MASK is available?
> + movw r1, #lo(MIDR_CORTEX_A7_R0P0 & MIDR_PRIMARY_PART_MASK)
> + movt r1, #hi(MIDR_CORTEX_A7_R0P0 & MIDR_PRIMARY_PART_MASK)
Why don't you use "ldr r*, =..." statement here?
> + orr r1, #(MIDR_CORTEX_A15_R0P0 & 0xf0)
This code relies on the value of MIDR_CORTEX_A15_R0P0.
So, I think you can rewrite this part more simply as follows:
mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0 @ read MIDR
ldr r1, =MIDR_PRIMARY_PART_MASK
and r0, r0, r1 @ mask out variant and revision
ldr r1, =MIDR_CORTEX_A7_R0P0
cmp r0, r1 @ check for Cortex-A7
ldr r1, =MIDR_CORTEX_A15_R0P0
cmpne r0, r1 @ check for Cortex-A15
> + bx lr
Add ENDPROC(_nonsec_init) when beginning with ENTRY(_nonsec_init).
> +/* defined in cpu/armv7/nonsec_virt.S */
> +void _nonsec_init(void);
I think this comment is not necessary and
mantainancability is not excellent in case you renaming
nonsec_virt.S.
BTW, tag generation tool, GNU Global can help us
for searching definition.
If you begin routines in assembly with ENTRY(...),
GNU Global picks up these symbols for tag jump.
Masahiro Yamada
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
