On 07/01/2013 03:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > With the do_bootm_states re-organization, we have the call to any > potential sub-commands in a single spot. If one fails, we can then stop > right there and return to the caller. Prior to these calls we have > already ensured that ret is zero so we will not be returning this error > for some other case. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andreas Bießmann <[email protected]> on avr32 > --- > common/cmd_bootm.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
