Dear Tom Rini, In message <20130702162829.GG16630@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > That said, when others have suggested something like this before, > Wolfgang has pointed out and NAK'd the idea of adding N different > configuration as that adds (potentially) a lot of build time for > custodians/etc that tend to build --soc or --arch or other group > targets. So, what do we want to do here? I guess longer term, if we > are able to focus on switching to Kconfig, it would become we provide a > generic defconfig for am335x (or imx6 or ...) with a best-fit-for-all > set and communities can provide tweaked binaries as needed. But do we > want to think about any stop-gap solutions here?
You can always add extra defines on the make command line... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] Small is beautiful. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
