Hi!
> > > > From: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@altera.com>
> > > >
> > > > Because the SOCFPGA platform will include support for Cyclone V and
> > > > Arria V FPGA parts, renaming socfpga_cyclone5 folder to socfpga to
> > > > be more generic.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@altera.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@denx.de>
> > > > Cc: Chin Liang See <cl...@altera.com>
> > > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de>
> > > > CC: Pavel Machek <pa...@denx.de>
> > > > Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com>
> > > >
> > > > v2:
> > > > - Add Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek
> > > > - Cc: Tom Rini
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Do you really mean that V2 is the exact same code as V1? If it is, then
> > > V2 is unneeded. And if V2 is different from V1, then history should
> > > tells us the difference(s).
> >
> > V2 is the same as v1 codewise. So should I resend this a V1 to be
> > applied?
>
> If V1 is the same as V2 as far as the code is concerned, then there is
> simply no point in sending V2 or resending V1 again.
>
> The V2 history makes me guess you thought it necessary to officialize
> Pavel's Reviewed-By somehow, but that's unneeded; patchworks takes care
> of collecting all the {Reviewed,Acked,Tested,...}-by's and providing
> them when applying the patch through pwclient.
This got pretty confusing lately. Can we just wait for the patches to
be applied, or do we need to take some action?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
