Dear Roger, In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > Thank you Wolfgang for simplifying license handling!
You are welcome! > What about dual licensed files? What do you prefer? > > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause This was my initial idea when I started thinking about this, but then I realized that there were a few files that had (by accident) both GPL-2.0+ and GPL-2.0 license headers (separated by a larger text block, so it was not obvious at first glance), so my first attempts of automatic editing would generate two (here incompatible) License-ID entries. Because of this I think there should be exactly one License-ID entry in any file. So for dual-licensed files the entry should list the license IDs in a single entry. > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+, BSD-2-Clause > Other seperator? Yes, please let's just use white space for separation; this is easier to parse by simple (shell) scripts. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] "I've seen it. It's rubbish." - Marvin the Paranoid Android _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
