On 08/13/2013 10:54 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 12:02 +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote: >> NAND_ECC_SOFT was the only option available while the SOFT_BCH option >> may also be used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 6 +++++- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Acked-by: Scott Wood <[email protected]> > > Is this for use with http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/168855/ or do you > have a 2K-page NAND that requires more than 1 bit of ECC correction? >
We have a 2K-page NAND but we have found out that we need more than 1 bit of ECC correction otherwise with some suppliers we sometimes see uncorrectable bitflips. Valentin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
