Timur Tabi wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> It frees the variable up for later such blocks to use. As does
>> declaring iterators inside a for loop, but I guess that's forbidden as
>> well. :-)
>
> I'm not sure whether we want to allow the same variable to be defined
> more than once, even with the same type, inside a function.
What's wrong with this:?
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
int j;
...
}
for (i = 0; i < m; i++) {
int j;
...
}
>> Chances are it will allocate all stack space for all variables up front,
>> regardless of where they're declared.
>
> Yes, but it many cases it won't allocate any stack space at all because
> it will just keep the variable in a register. My point was that if a
> variable is defined later in a function, then it's more likely to have
> limited scope, so the compiler will be more likely to use a register
> instead of stack to store it.
I don't think it will make a difference. The compiler knows what the
lifetime of the variable is, regardless of where you declare it.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
