Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201309121605.04824.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Looking at the code one more time, it'd make most sense to simply allocate > the > buffer NOT on stack, but with some memalign-kind-of call to avoid this abuse > of > stack. You see, the max packet size is around 2k, which is quite a lot. How > does > this proposal sound to you ?
It makes perfect sense to allocate variable with function scope only on the stack. That's what the stack has been invented for. If there is a bug with that, this mug must be isolated and fixed. It makes zero sense to just paper over it. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
