Hi Otavio, Le Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:24:12 -0300, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> a écrit :
> The part_validate comment had a wrong description of the actions it > does and referenced to non-existent functions while in fact it calls > 'part_validate_eraseblock()'. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> > --- > common/cmd_mtdparts.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c > index 3023479..0104285 100644 > --- a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c > +++ b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c > @@ -381,10 +381,10 @@ static int part_validate_eraseblock(struct mtdids *id, > struct part_info *part) > > > /** > - * Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are verified > - * to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and either > - * parts_validate_nor() or parts_validate_nand() is called with the argument > - * of part. > + * Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are > + * verified to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and > + * either part_validate_eraseblock() is called with the argument of and now you can remove either ;-) Eric _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
