> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swar...@wwwdotorg.org] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:59 PM > To: Vidya Sagar; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Stephen Warren; Tom Warren > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: allow build to succeed with SPL disabled > > On 10/31/2013 03:21 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin and u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin binaries are generated > > only if the SPL build is enabled as they have dependency on SPL build > > Should they though? If there's no SPL, surely we still want to generate the > same output filenames, so that consumers of the binaries don't have to care > whether a particular board needs the SPL tacked onto the binary. > > In other words, rather than: > > u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin == SPL + U-Boot > u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin == SPL + U-Boot + DTB > > ... when SPL is disabled, shouldn't we generate: > > u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin == U-Boot > u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin == U-Boot + DTB > > That would require modifying the rules that generate those files not to > include the SPL binary in the concatenation, rather than simply not > generating those files at all.
When the SPL build is disabled, we are already generating u-boot.bin and u-boot-dtb.bin. Do we really want to generate two more binaries with the same content but with different names ? -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
