Hi Marek,
On 04/11/2013 12:50, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 02/11/2013 18:23, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> + if (!timeout) {
>>> + debug("MXS I2C: Failed receiving data!\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> This is a real error and not a debug information. IMHO it should be
>> better to print the error unconditionally with puts/printf, reporting
>> that the timer elapsed.
>
> Returning -EINVAL will make the i2c stack trigger an output, so having it
> duplicated here is pointless I believe.
Agree on that. But then, should we not return -ETIMEDOUT (-110) ? We
should print the error code in the i2c stack (do_i2c_read) instead of
checking only if the return value is not null, as we do now.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de
=====================================================================
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
