On 11/07/2013 06:29 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:46:31 +0200, Andre Heider <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 10/22/2013 09:27 PM, Andre Heider wrote: >>>> Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan. >>> >>> This one patch, >>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >>> >>> You need to send/cc this patch to Albert Aribauld, since he applies ARM >>> patches. Or, perhaps just make sure the patch gets assigned to him in >>> patchwork? >> >> Okay, I did the patchwork dance :) >> >> Thanks, >> Andre > > In fact, the series could be applied as a whole by the same custodian > -- and actually, I'd prefer it to be applied as a whole, since patch 1/2 > alone looks like dead/useless code, whereas it makes sense if applied > along with 2/2.
So, there are 2 patches and 2 custodians. One of you has to ack the patch for the other to merge them both through the other's subsystem, right? I guess you want Anatolij to take both of these through the video tree based on your comments. If so, can you ack this patch and re-assign them both in patchwork, so he knows that? _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
