Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1239749550.24099.147.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote: ... > #1 is ugly in that 99.99% of the time an empty os_support.c file is > processed. > > #2 is ugly in that the Makefile method to determine a target OS is > somewhat hokey and will only get hokier if/when additional OS targets > are supported. > > I'd vote for #1 as I think the wasted time of processing os_support.c is > a drop in the bucket and it seems a bit cleaner than hacking up the > Makefile. > > If others have any clever ideas let me know.
It seems there were no really clever ideas, or did I miss them? Hm.. actually I lost track of which patch is missing. Could you please send me a pointer to the latest and greatest version? Sorry & thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Men don't talk peace unless they're ready to back it up with war. -- Col. Green, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.4 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot