Dear Peter Tyser,

In message <1239749550.24099.147.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
...
> #1 is ugly in that 99.99% of the time an empty os_support.c file is
> processed.
> 
> #2 is ugly in that the Makefile method to determine a target OS is
> somewhat hokey and will only get hokier if/when additional OS targets
> are supported.
> 
> I'd vote for #1 as I think the wasted time of processing os_support.c is
> a drop in the bucket and it seems a bit cleaner than hacking up the
> Makefile.
> 
> If others have any clever ideas let me know.

It seems there were no really clever ideas, or did I miss them?

Hm.. actually I lost track of which patch is missing. Could you please
send me a pointer to the latest and greatest version?  Sorry & thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Men don't talk peace unless they're ready to back it up with war.
        -- Col. Green, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.4
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to