Dear Ricardo Ribalda Delgado, In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > > > If the only purpose of zunzip() is to be used here, then why do we not > > make the parameters fit the intended purpose, thus avoiding an > > additional wrapper? > > The purpose of zunzip is to use it in more places. Like Mike Frysinger said: > > <Mike> > this really should be a common function not specific to ubifs as there are > many other opportunities for things to be compressed directly with zlib and > not through gzip (splash/video images come to mind). > </Mike> > > Also, in order to be "parameter compatible" with lzo, we should keep > this wrapper (am I right Stefan?)
But cannot these other pleaces use a parameter-compatible version as well, or even better (because they might then eventually use lzo as well, at least more easily) ? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] Hiring experienced unix people is like a built-in filter against idiots. Hiring experienced NT people provides no such guarantee. -- Miguel Cruz in [email protected] _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
