On 27 January 2014 08:53, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 01/26/2014 09:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 24 January 2014 12:46, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org
>> <mailto:swar...@wwwdotorg.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com <mailto:swar...@nvidia.com>>
>>
>>     Tegra124's MMC controller is very similar to earlier SoC generations,
>>     and can be supported by the same driver.
>>
>>     However, there are some non-backwards-compatible HW differences, and
>>     hence a new DT compatible value must be used to describe the HW. This
>>     patch updates the driver to support that new compatible value.
>>
>>     That said, the HW differences are only relevant when enabling certain
>>     high-performance transfer modes. Since the driver is currently very
>>     simple and doesn't enable those modes, we don't actually need to address
>>     any of these HW differences in the code yet, hence the simple nature of
>>     this patch.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com
>>     <mailto:swar...@nvidia.com>>
>>     Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pa...@antoniou-consulting.com
>>     <mailto:pa...@antoniou-consulting.com>>
>>     Tested-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com
>>     <mailto:tred...@nvidia.com>>
>>
>>
>> As a general comment on this series (not this patch) there is is
>> distressing amount of code duplication. It seems to me that this is just
>> going to get more and more painful unless it is addressed. Removing and
>> refactoring duplicated code is a difficult task. In particular defining
>> almost identical clock functions in multiple files just doesn't seem
>> like a good idea.
>
> Granted this is true. I am in the process of filing a bug to
> de-duplicate the drivers.
>
>> Other than that this series looks good to me.
>
> Thanks. Is that an ack? :-)

I guess, particularly now that I know you've filed a bug :-)

The series:

Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to