Hello Simon,

Am 09.03.2014 06:33, schrieb Simon Glass:
Hi Heiko,

On 3 March 2014 04:19, Heiko Schocher<h...@denx.de>  wrote:
based on patch from andr...@oetken.name:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/294318/
commit message:
I currently need support for rsa-sha256 signatures in u-boot and found out that
the code for signatures is not very generic. Thus adding of different
hash-algorithms for rsa-signatures is not easy to do without copy-pasting the
rsa-code. I attached a patch for how I think it could be better and included
support for rsa-sha256. This is a fast first shot.

aditionally work:
- removed checkpatch warnings
- removed compiler warnings
- rebased against current head

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<h...@denx.de>
Cc: andr...@oetken.name
Cc: Simon Glass<s...@chromium.org>

This looks good to me. However, when running it I hit this crash?

O=b/sandbox test/vboot/vboot_test.sh
Simple Verified Boot Test
=========================

Please see doc/uImage.FIT/verified-boot.txt for more information

/home/sjg/c/src/third_party/u-boot/files/b/sandbox/tools/mkimage -D -I
dts -O dtb -p 2000
Build keys
do sha1 test
Build FIT with signed images
Test Verified Boot Run: unsigned signatures:: OK
Sign images
Test Verified Boot Run: signed images: OK
Build FIT with signed configuration
Test Verified Boot Run: unsigned config: OK
Sign images
Test Verified Boot Run: signed config: OK
check signed config on the host
*** buffer overflow detected ***:
/home/sjg/c/src/third_party/u-boot/files/b/sandbox/tools/fit_check_sign
terminated
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f07c7ba9f47]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x109e40)[0x7f07c7ba8e40]
[...]
   [vsyscall]
test/vboot/vboot_test.sh: line 65:  7597 Aborted                 (core
dumped) ${fit_check_sign} -f test.fit -k sandbox-u-boot.dtb>  ${tmp}

Verified boot key check on host failed, output follows:


Do you see this? Presumably not - I can dig a bit if you like?

No, I do not see this crash ... Hmm... you reply this error to the
4/8 patch of this series, but "fit_check_sign" is introduced in the
8/8 ... did you tried with all 8 patches applied?

Just tested with current head of U-Boot and I see no error:

commit 247161b8160fc699b0a517f081220bb50bc502a8
Merge: d57d60c 96ac18c
Author: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 7 20:54:22 2014 -0500

    Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx

$ O=sandbox ./test/vboot/vboot_test.sh
Simple Verified Boot Test
=========================

Please see doc/uImage.FIT/verified-boot.txt for more information

/home/hs/ids/u-boot/sandbox/tools/mkimage -D -I dts -O dtb -p 2000
Build keys
do sha1 test
Build FIT with signed images
Test Verified Boot Run: unsigned signatures:: OK
Sign images
Test Verified Boot Run: signed images: OK
Build FIT with signed configuration
Test Verified Boot Run: unsigned config: OK
Sign images
Test Verified Boot Run: signed config: OK
check signed config on the host
OK
Test Verified Boot Run: signed config: OK
Test Verified Boot Run: signed config with bad hash: OK
do sha256 test
Build FIT with signed images
Test Verified Boot Run: unsigned signatures:: OK
Sign images
Test Verified Boot Run: signed images: OK
Build FIT with signed configuration
Test Verified Boot Run: unsigned config: OK
Sign images
Test Verified Boot Run: signed config: OK
check signed config on the host
OK
Test Verified Boot Run: signed config: OK
Test Verified Boot Run: signed config with bad hash: OK

Test passed
pollux:u-boot hs [temp] $

Can you try with current head again?

bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to