On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Yauhen Kharuzhy <jek...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cards which are not compatible with SD 2.0 standard, cat return response > for CMD8 command, but it will be invalid in terms of SD 2.0. We should > accept this case as admissible. > > Signed-off-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jek...@gmail.com>
You've got a typo in the description on a key word, "cat". Is it can't? can? I'm not convinced that this patch is valid. My understanding is that if a card receives a command it does not understand, it should not respond. Thus, if it responds with an error, it's an actual error. Are you saying that some cards respond to cmd 8 that don't implement 2.0? Because that would not totally surprise me, but would violate not just 2.0, but 1.x, as CMD8 is reserved. MMC cards should also not respond to CMD8 at this stage in initialization, as they are in the wrong state... Andy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
