On Monday, May 05, 2014 at 08:12:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Albert, > >> > >> I was wondering when the next pull request for u-boot-arm/master -> > >> u-boot/master was likely to be? > >> > >> I asked because some changes to the Tegra USB driver went through the > >> u-boot-tegra/master and hence are now in u-boot-arm/master, but not in > >> u-boot-usb/master. I have some more USB driver changes which rely on the > >> earlier USB patches, and these should really go through > >> u-boot-usb/master rather than the Tegra/ARM tree. For this to happen, > >> u-boot-usb/master needs to contain the patches currently in > >> u-boot-arm/master, and the best way for that to happen is for those > >> patches to get into u-boot/master so that u-boot-usb/master can merge > >> them. > >> > >> Or, should Marek just merge u-boot-arm/master into his tree directly? > > > > Or should we have a 'u-boot-next' tree using the same concept as the > > kernel 'linux-next'? > > Please, u-boot-next! > > It is clear we need this to scale the pull model.
As Stephen already explained, u-boot-next solves nothing. U-boot-next will actually be explicitly unhelpful here because I won't be able to work on top of it and then send PRs to Tom . This just cannot work as it would break history . Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
