Dear Vasili, On ma, 2014-05-19 at 12:45 +0300, Vasili Galka wrote: [...]
> 2. I see a reoccurring pattern of some headers being used from the host, > causing mismatches and arising build errors. Then some way is sought > to include headers from U-Boot tree prior to them which solves the > problem. This happens for both Linux and Cygwin. you can add FreeBSD to the list as well, see [1] > This pattern is a > result of the original decision from 2004 to prioritize the host > include paths over the paths from U-Boot tree. any reference? > I see this happening > again and again with different headers in the future. So here comes > the question, is it really the right thing prioritize the include > paths this way? Why do host paths MUST come first? > I'll try reverting this locally and looking what breaks and what > alternative solutions exist. I have no idea why it is the way it is, but keep in mind that e.g. stdio headers in u-boot is quite something different then stdio for the target userland. Regards, Jeroen [1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-May/179301.html _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot