Hi Albert,

On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:35:06 +0200
Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote:

> Hi Masahiro,
> 
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:36:56 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Albert,
> > 
> > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:14:11 +0200
> > Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Masahiro,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 26 May 2014 19:43:50 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
> > > <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Commit 41623c91 moved exception handling to arch/arm/lib/vectors.S,
> > > > breaking CONFIG_USE_IRQ feature.
> > > > 
> > > > If CONFIG_USE_IRQ is enabled, undefined reference error occurs.
> > > > 
> > > >   arch/arm/lib/built-in.o: In function `interrupt_init':
> > > >   arch/arm/lib/interrupts.c:37: undefined reference to `IRQ_STACK_START'
> > > >   arch/arm/lib/interrupts.c:37: undefined reference to `FIQ_STACK_START'
> > > >   make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
> > > > 
> > > > Because arch/arm/lib/vectors.S includes references to
> > > > CONFIG_SYS_DV_NOR_BOOT_CFG and CONFIG_USE_IRQ, it must include 
> > > > <config.h>.
> > > 
> > > I routinely build all of ARM (32-bit) and AARCH64 (64-bit) targets and
> > > make sure all of them build properly, and concerning CONFIG_USE_IRQ, I
> > > even have a branch set to remove this option since a
> > > 
> > >   git grep CONFIG_USE_IRQ | grep -vE \
> > >   '(#define|#ifdef|#ifndef|#if.*defined|#undef|#endif)'
> > > 
> > > shows that it is defined nowhere in our code.
> > > 
> > > Which source code are you using?
> > 
> > Out-of-tree board support code, maintained locally.
> 
> Then I'm afraid you'll have to keep this patch local too -- and note
> that I am considering overhauling, and possibly removing entirely,
> CONFIG_USE_IRQ (my grep command comes from my WIP on this).


You are not understanding at all what is the problem.

You changed the behaviour of three boards,
"enbw_cmc", "da850evm_direct_nor", "calimain"!
Probably they are broken.

These boards expects "0x00000011" (=CONFIG_SYS_DV_NOR_BOOT_CFG)
at the beginning of the image.
But since commit 41623c91, that is missing.

If you still don't understand,  you should checkout   41623c91^ and 41623c91
and compare u-boot.dis.


Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to