On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:48:09AM +0200, Ulf Magnusson wrote: > I personally mostly care about Kconfiglib being useful to people. I'm open > to suggestions if the current license in any way gets in the way of that. :) > > (I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, so you might have to forward the > reply there.)
Sorry, that was to Masahiro, to correct the tag we used. The license on the code currently is GPL compatible which is what we care about. Thanks! > > /Ulf > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:41:43AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > > I think this series (v2) is under review now, > > > but I have noticed my big mistake in terms of the license. > > > > > > In v2, I accidentally added GPL-2.0+ SPDX > > > but it should have been ISC SPDX. > > > > Bah, please post a patch correcting things now and I'll grab it right > > away. > > > > -- > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
