Jagan Teki wrote: > On 30 September 2014 18:41, David Müller (ELSOFT AG) > <d.muel...@elsoft.ch> wrote: >> Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On 30 September 2014 16:53, David Müller <d.muel...@elsoft.ch> wrote: >>>> +int board_early_init_f(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + spi_init_f(); >>> >>> Why you need to do this, spi_init_f is trying to call from >>> arch/powerpc/lib/board.c >>> any specific reason, I couldn't understand the fix you mentioned on >>> the commit body. >> >> There is an EEPROM attached to the SPI channel containing vital board >> data. Calling spi_init_f() from arch/powerpc/lib/board.c will be too late. > > Sorry, this looks an other issue - but anyway we're trying to remove
What kind of "other issue" do you mean? > spi_init* stuff > from drivers/spi/* in future and I don't think it's a good idea to use that. In this case what is the proposed way of initializing the SPI subsystem? _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot