On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:10:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 05:57:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:45:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > > On 10/09/2014 04:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 at 10:37:52 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I changed the subject, since it long didn't match the topic. > > > > [snip] > > > > > >> If there is a problem because Albert is just too busy we should at > > > >> least try to find out any reasonable way how to handle this. Like in > > > >> Linux ARM-SOC custodian? > > > > > > > > I don't this Albert is the problem, I am starting to suspect we simply > > > > lack custodian manpower in general. And I also suspect we're not quite > > > > inviting and attractive crowd, which is something we should discuss > > > > too ... > > > > > > +1 on this. > > > > Yes, lets talk more about this. > > Also a CI would really help. Vadim was already proposing one last year too, > we should certainly review the outcome on that.
I don't think anything went too far on that, but in a follow-up elsewhere I'm not having buildman do something I thought it did, but perhaps I imagined, which was only show me new problems since the last time it ran. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
