Hi Jeroen, On 12 October 2014 10:13, Jeroen Hofstee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Hans, > > On 12-10-14 12:25, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This one seems to have fallen through the cracks. >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> >> (for U-boot) > > nope, you replace an innocent warning (_might_ be) with > bad code, without any comment it is just because gcc failed > to recognize it is fine. Nor did you respond to the suggestion > if it helps gcc to recognize that if the two booleans are merged > into a single one. [or even split it in an if () if ()]. With this patch > you prevent any serious warning in case the variable is actually > used but not initialized, which is even worse if you ask me. > That is a pretty acerbic tone to take on the U-Boot list at least. Are you two drinking buddies or something? Regards, Simon
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
