+CC: Graham Moore On 11/10/2014 04:47 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2014-11-07 18:26:05, Stefan Roese wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 07.11.2014 18:21, Simon Glass wrote: >>>> + qspi: spi@ff705000 { >>>> + compatible = "cadence,qspi"; >>>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>>> + #size-cells = <0>; >>>> + reg = <0xff705000 0x1000>, >>>> + <0xffa00000 0x1000>; >>>> + interrupts = <0 151 4>; >>>> + clocks = <&qspi_clk>; >>>> + ext-decoder = <0>; /* external decoder */ >>>> + num-chipselect = <4>; >>>> + fifo-depth = <128>; >>>> + bus-num = <2>; >>>> + status = "disabled"; >>>> + }; >>>> + >>> >>> Is this the same binding as Linux? Can you please bring in the binding >>> document too? Some of these feel like they should have a >>> "manufacture," prefix. >> >> Yes, its from Linux. But not from kernel.org but from the Altera >> Rocketboards.org version (v3.16). So the bindings might change if this >> driver would be pushed to mainline Linux. > > I guess it would be good to submit the binding to Linux for review, so > that we don't end up with two incompatible bindings... >
Graham has already submitted an RFC, but have not gotten any feedback yet. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141417787314186&w=2 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot